Talk:Unreleased - Revision history

Esn: /* um */

2011-03-03T04:59:07Z

‎um

Maplesugarlover: /* um */

2011-03-03T03:43:17Z

‎um

Esn: /* um */

2011-03-03T01:26:01Z

‎um

Maplesugarlover: /* um */

2011-03-02T20:51:13Z

‎um

Esn: /* um */

2011-03-02T02:19:32Z

‎um

Esn: /* um */

2011-03-02T02:18:27Z

‎um

Maplesugarlover: /* um */

2011-02-28T21:02:35Z

‎um

Esn: New page: ==um== Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worke...

2011-02-28T11:24:31Z

New page: ==um== Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worke...

New page

==um==
Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worked-on stuff stay on their own pages? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 12:24, 28 February 2011 (MET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 3 March 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Well, it just kinda makes more sense to me to have things on just 3 pages, instead of 4. After all, they're separated into different sections on this page ''anyway'', because the column structures are different for them. Check out what I did with the "unreleased" section in [[games (fork)]]. I made it more verifiable, so that you can see which projects are still likely to be active and which aren't. There are just two of them where I couldn't find any mention except for the wiki - perhaps if there's really nothing to be found, those can be deleted. I just restored the original list, not the one from this page. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 02:26, 3 March 2011 (MET)		:Well, it just kinda makes more sense to me to have things on just 3 pages, instead of 4. After all, they're separated into different sections on this page ''anyway'', because the column structures are different for them. Check out what I did with the "unreleased" section in [[games (fork)]]. I made it more verifiable, so that you can see which projects are still likely to be active and which aren't. There are just two of them where I couldn't find any mention except for the wiki - perhaps if there's really nothing to be found, those can be deleted. I just restored the original list, not the one from this page. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 02:26, 3 March 2011 (MET)
	Good to hear that, and for the sake of curiosity what were the 2 ones you couldn't find? [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 04:43, 3 March 2011 (MET)		Good to hear that, and for the sake of curiosity what were the 2 ones you couldn't find? [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 04:43, 3 March 2011 (MET)
		+
		+	Oops, looks like it's 3, actually. They're "AE presents Revolt", by Neil AE, genre FPS. Then "Albion" by MH-T; comment says "Already a port to GP2X Personally asked author if he plans to port this statically recompiled version" - there's probably a mention of that on the forums somewhere. Also "Ms Driller" by Wally (an actual homebrew of that name does exist, but I have no idea who Wally is). [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 05:59, 3 March 2011 (MET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:43, 3 March 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Esn, are you going to add stuff back to the original pages and get this one deleted? If so, try to use an early revision of this page, those had more stuff [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 21:51, 2 March 2011 (MET)		Esn, are you going to add stuff back to the original pages and get this one deleted? If so, try to use an early revision of this page, those had more stuff [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 21:51, 2 March 2011 (MET)
	:Well, it just kinda makes more sense to me to have things on just 3 pages, instead of 4. After all, they're separated into different sections on this page ''anyway'', because the column structures are different for them. Check out what I did with the "unreleased" section in [[games (fork)]]. I made it more verifiable, so that you can see which projects are still likely to be active and which aren't. There are just two of them where I couldn't find any mention except for the wiki - perhaps if there's really nothing to be found, those can be deleted. I just restored the original list, not the one from this page. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 02:26, 3 March 2011 (MET)		:Well, it just kinda makes more sense to me to have things on just 3 pages, instead of 4. After all, they're separated into different sections on this page ''anyway'', because the column structures are different for them. Check out what I did with the "unreleased" section in [[games (fork)]]. I made it more verifiable, so that you can see which projects are still likely to be active and which aren't. There are just two of them where I couldn't find any mention except for the wiki - perhaps if there's really nothing to be found, those can be deleted. I just restored the original list, not the one from this page. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 02:26, 3 March 2011 (MET)
		+	Good to hear that, and for the sake of curiosity what were the 2 ones you couldn't find? [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 04:43, 3 March 2011 (MET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 3 March 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Who says that the software lists are for released software? I don't think anyone did say that until you just did right now... Why shouldn't they be for both, what's the advantage of this? They had their own sections at the bottom, anyway. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 03:19, 2 March 2011 (MET)		::Who says that the software lists are for released software? I don't think anyone did say that until you just did right now... Why shouldn't they be for both, what's the advantage of this? They had their own sections at the bottom, anyway. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 03:19, 2 March 2011 (MET)
	Esn, are you going to add stuff back to the original pages and get this one deleted? If so, try to use an early revision of this page, those had more stuff [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 21:51, 2 March 2011 (MET)		Esn, are you going to add stuff back to the original pages and get this one deleted? If so, try to use an early revision of this page, those had more stuff [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 21:51, 2 March 2011 (MET)
		+	:Well, it just kinda makes more sense to me to have things on just 3 pages, instead of 4. After all, they're separated into different sections on this page ''anyway'', because the column structures are different for them. Check out what I did with the "unreleased" section in [[games (fork)]]. I made it more verifiable, so that you can see which projects are still likely to be active and which aren't. There are just two of them where I couldn't find any mention except for the wiki - perhaps if there's really nothing to be found, those can be deleted. I just restored the original list, not the one from this page. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 02:26, 3 March 2011 (MET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:51, 2 March 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:the software lists are for released software. Port request is for request and unreleased is for software being worked on that is not released yet [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 22:02, 28 February 2011 (MET)		:the software lists are for released software. Port request is for request and unreleased is for software being worked on that is not released yet [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 22:02, 28 February 2011 (MET)
	::Who says that the software lists are for released software? I don't think anyone did say that until you just did right now... Why shouldn't they be for both, what's the advantage of this? They had their own sections at the bottom, anyway. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 03:19, 2 March 2011 (MET)		::Who says that the software lists are for released software? I don't think anyone did say that until you just did right now... Why shouldn't they be for both, what's the advantage of this? They had their own sections at the bottom, anyway. [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 03:19, 2 March 2011 (MET)
		+	Esn, are you going to add stuff back to the original pages and get this one deleted? If so, try to use an early revision of this page, those had more stuff [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 21:51, 2 March 2011 (MET)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worked-on stuff stay on their own pages? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 12:24, 28 February 2011 (MET)
 :the software lists are for released software. Port request is for request and unreleased is for software being worked on that is not released yet [[User:Maplesugarlover|maplesugarlover]] 22:02, 28 February 2011 (MET)
-::Who says that the software lists are for released software? I don't think anyone did say that until you just did right now... Why shouldn't they be for both, what's the advantage of this? [[User:Esn|Esn]] 03:18, 2 March 2011 (MET)
+::Who says that the software lists are for released software? I don't think anyone did say that until you just did right now... Why shouldn't they be for both, what's the advantage of this? They had their own sections at the bottom, anyway. [[User:Esn|Esn]] 03:19, 2 March 2011 (MET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 2 March 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worked-on stuff stay on their own pages? [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 12:24, 28 February 2011 (MET)		Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worked-on stuff stay on their own pages? [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 12:24, 28 February 2011 (MET)
	:the software lists are for released software. Port request is for request and unreleased is for software being worked on that is not released yet [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 22:02, 28 February 2011 (MET)		:the software lists are for released software. Port request is for request and unreleased is for software being worked on that is not released yet [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 22:02, 28 February 2011 (MET)
		+	::Who says that the software lists are for released software? I don't think anyone did say that until you just did right now... Why shouldn't they be for both, what's the advantage of this? [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 03:18, 2 March 2011 (MET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 28 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==um==		==um==
	Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worked-on stuff stay on their own pages? [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 12:24, 28 February 2011 (MET)		Sorry, I was away for a week on vacation, so perhaps I wasn't given the chance to protest... I was wondering what the point of this page is; why shouldn't the unreleased being-worked-on stuff stay on their own pages? [[User:Esn\|Esn]] 12:24, 28 February 2011 (MET)
		+	:the software lists are for released software. Port request is for request and unreleased is for software being worked on that is not released yet [[User:Maplesugarlover\|maplesugarlover]] 22:02, 28 February 2011 (MET)